- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 1
Group Delay
- GekoMusic94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
13 years 8 months ago #12356
by GekoMusic94
Group Delay was created by GekoMusic94
Hi,
What do you think of this group delay for a 12" infra (35-60Hz)?
Thanks, Giacomo. smiley1
What do you think of this group delay for a 12" infra (35-60Hz)?
Thanks, Giacomo. smiley1
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- GekoMusic94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 8 months ago #12366
by GekoMusic94
Replied by GekoMusic94 on topic Group Delay
Anyone? smiley2
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- saul
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 583
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 8 months ago #12367
by saul
Replied by saul on topic Group Delay
looks rather spikey to me which could obviously result in poor fidelity
needs be as smooth as poss
needs be as smooth as poss
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- GekoMusic94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 8 months ago #12370
by GekoMusic94
Replied by GekoMusic94 on topic Group Delay
Thanks!
Even with a bandpass box?
How can i flatten it out?
Thanks, Giacomo. smiley1
Even with a bandpass box?
How can i flatten it out?
Thanks, Giacomo. smiley1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- saul
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Less
More
- Posts: 583
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 8 months ago #12371
by saul
Replied by saul on topic Group Delay
make the chambers smaller?
would help if you put up the general schematic of the box.
im sure some others will be able to give more helpful advice also.
would help if you put up the general schematic of the box.
im sure some others will be able to give more helpful advice also.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- GekoMusic94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 8 months ago #12373
by GekoMusic94
Replied by GekoMusic94 on topic Group Delay
Here it is! smiley2
Attachments:
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- GekoMusic94
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Senior Member
Less
More
- Posts: 53
- Thank you received: 1
13 years 8 months ago #12446
by GekoMusic94
Replied by GekoMusic94 on topic Group Delay
Bump! smiley1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- jsg
- Offline
- Elite Member
Less
More
- Posts: 236
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 7 months ago #13227
by jsg
You've designed a very sharp bottom-end rolloff. This causes the group delay peak (amplitude response and group delay response are related). But a sharp rolloff as you've designed also gives the best LF extension and efficiency for a given cabinet size.
So you could choose to soften the low-end knee and get less GD peak but a slightly higher -3dB point.
But I think 40ms at 35Hz isn't too bad. I'd maybe try and get it down to 25ms or so and call it a day.
GD is much more audible in kick and upper bass, so it's important not to develop a second (big) GD peak at the upper end - you have not, so that's good.
Ars est celare artem
Replied by jsg on topic Group Delay
GekoMusic94 wrote: Bump! smiley1
You've designed a very sharp bottom-end rolloff. This causes the group delay peak (amplitude response and group delay response are related). But a sharp rolloff as you've designed also gives the best LF extension and efficiency for a given cabinet size.
So you could choose to soften the low-end knee and get less GD peak but a slightly higher -3dB point.
But I think 40ms at 35Hz isn't too bad. I'd maybe try and get it down to 25ms or so and call it a day.
GD is much more audible in kick and upper bass, so it's important not to develop a second (big) GD peak at the upper end - you have not, so that's good.
Ars est celare artem
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 1.198 seconds