Cubo 18

More
10 years 9 months ago #21396 by Cubo15
Replied by Cubo15 on topic Cubo 18
The MT130 or MT121 become suitable i.m.o. if you're ending up with building at least 4 x Cubo 18 (total). If you're using 1 or 2 Cubo's, a simple reflex cabinet is a better choice, as it offers wider dispersion and will easily drop down to 80 Hz.

Best regards

Cubo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21426 by thohaug
Replied by thohaug on topic Cubo 18
Hello Cubo. My friend and I are having a project and the plan is building 4x of the Cubo 18. High Spl in the lower range and good sound quality is why we have chosen this build. We Browsed through some drivers and we landed on the RCF LF18G401. How do you think these drivers will fare in this build?
On paper they look like a pretty good match, but I'd like your opinion on our choice.

Here is the T/S Parameters:


Resonance frequency

Fs 33 Hz

Re 4.8 Ohm

Qms 7.6

Qes 0.30

Qts 0.29

BL 24.6 T · m

Mms 182 gr

Vas 268 liters

Sd 0.122 m2

Xmax 8.5 mm

Le1K 2.4 mH

Eff 3.09 %






I laid the spec sheet file here in addition if you need to see something else about the driver
Attachments:

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 9 months ago #21433 by Cubo15
Replied by Cubo15 on topic Cubo 18
Those are goood drivers (third o intended). They will also work in Cubo Sub for that lowest oemmpph. In Cubo 18 Extended they'll offer maximum SPL, whilst still being a one-man-lift.

Best regards

Cubo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago - 10 years 8 months ago #21436 by thohaug
Replied by thohaug on topic Cubo 18
Thanks for the reply!
Also one more thing. How is it by stacking these 2 and 2? or even 4 by 4. Is there anything to gain?
In the case which it is something to gain then how is the best way to stack them in order to get the most advantage of it?
Last edit: 10 years 8 months ago by thohaug.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago #21439 by Cubo15
Replied by Cubo15 on topic Cubo 18
There is subtile differences between different stacking configurations, some might pronounce the ~100 -120 Hz 'kick'-region, others have slightly more 40-50 Hz output.. Stacking flattens response but can also create peaks. Personally I prefer to place these differences under the heading 'personal preferences'. Placing the horn mouth's together is always a good idea though.

Best regards

Cubo

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago #21443 by rotebass
Replied by rotebass on topic Cubo 18
Hey Cubo,
Plans have changed since I last posted, Fane turned out to be a dead end in my area. I currently have a B&C 18TBW100 sitting in a box, I know that some of the other B&C 18's have been modelled but I can't find anything on this driver.

Any thoughts?

Thanks

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago - 10 years 8 months ago #21448 by thohaug
Replied by thohaug on topic Cubo 18
Building is now finished!

Here is the end result.

[IMG
Last edit: 10 years 8 months ago by thohaug.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago #21450 by sn95
Replied by sn95 on topic Cubo 18
Nice looking

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago #21463 by bee

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
10 years 8 months ago #21470 by Cubo15
Replied by Cubo15 on topic Cubo 18
@Rotebass: The 18TBW100 is best used in Cubo 18 Extended, with the magnet inside the horn. Parameter-wise it's a true subwoofer driver though, so it would have it's place in Cubo Sub as well.

@Thohaug: Daring colour, looks good. Are you gonna use rubber feet?

Best regards

Cubo
The following user(s) said Thank You: rotebass

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.238 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum