- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 0
Push pull cabinet designs?
- MAutopsy
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
Mike
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bitzo
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 637
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bee
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2090
- Thank you received: 34
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MAutopsy
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 0
How are these simmed?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bee
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 2090
- Thank you received: 34
Bitzo this is also true, ive not seen many good designs were the one driver sits behind the other (re pic a)......
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- nrpinc
- Offline
- Senior Member
- Posts: 75
- Thank you received: 0
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MAutopsy
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 0
Mike
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- bitzo
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 637
- Thank you received: 1
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- MAutopsy
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Platinum Member
- Posts: 361
- Thank you received: 0
the DJK style cabs have one rear chamber and a manifold style opening, from what i have gathered, the closer you can mount the drivers the better. My question is how does one determine the rear chamber and porting info. as a double driver reflex or something else. the one PM i got sent from DJK said that they ARE NOT isobaric, leaving me puzzled smiley29bitzo wrote: To me the main trouble to design this type of cab is modeling exactly the same compression chamber and rear chamber for both drivers just because the drivers volume isn't known.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- Pasi
- Offline
- Junior Member
- Posts: 26
- Thank you received: 2
MAutopsy wrote:
the DJK style cabs have one rear chamber and a manifold style opening, from what i have gathered, the closer you can mount the drivers the better. My question is how does one determine the rear chamber and porting info. as a double driver reflex or something else. the one PM i got sent from DJK said that they ARE NOT isobaric, leaving me puzzled smiley29bitzo wrote: To me the main trouble to design this type of cab is modeling exactly the same compression chamber and rear chamber for both drivers just because the drivers volume isn't known.
They are reflex boxes. Rear chamber and porting is calculated just like in normal 6th order reflex box. Manifold is non resonant in operating range.
Isobaric mounting means drivers mounted on different sides of plywood to same hole cones facing each other. This leaves a small airtight gap between drivers and only 1 driver is basicly creating all the sound you hear and other is helping to create better environment to this driver. This halves the Vas and box size for example.
Push pull configuration is where drivers are mounted separately like in normal 218 sub. Difference is that other driver is mounted cone outwards and the other is mounted cone inwards showing magnet outside the box. Benefit of this arrangement is cancellation of nonlinear behaviour of suspension and spider.
Both configurations are wired same way, in opposite polarities. Like name indicates in push pull configuration for example, when the driver which has magnet inside the box is puhing cone outwards the other driver which has magnet outside the box is pulling it outwards thus being in same phase.
Hope this helps.
I'll try to be more around now and answer any questions rised. Best way to get my attention is either PM or post to Ohm area.
Best regards,
Pasi
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.