• Home
  • Plans
  • Forum
  • Downloads
  • Login
    • Profile
  1. You are here:  
  2. Home
  3. Plans

Cubo Kick

Cubo Kick is a midbass bin to enforce the Cubo series or any other sub bass cabinet in the kick bass region. Like all Cubo models, Cubo Kick is designed to offer maximum performance when used in a stand-alone operation.

Cubo Kick 15 is the largest at 62 x 62 x 62 cm (H x W x D), aimed at 80 - 200 Hz, it has the most output in the 120 Hz area, for that well known "pressure on the chest kinda feeling". Not only do the frontal dimensions match with Cubo 15, 18, 21 and Sub, but the output is also high enough to use Cubo Kick in a 1:2 ratio (1.5:1 for live music). On top of two Cubo 15's it will raise the minimal height for the high mid top to 180 - 190 cm, bringing it well above the crowd ears. The cut sheet fits from a single sheet of 122 x 244 cm, 18 mm 13-ply Baltic birch is preferred. Originally designed around the 18Sound 15ND930. Other drivers that will work:

- Eminence Kappa Pro 15
- Faital Pro 15FH520
- Faital Pro 15FH500

The width of the cabinet can easily be modified, Cubo Kick 15 at 45 cm wide is best used in combination with 12" drivers to get the middle way, 100 - 220 Hz when used stand alone.

Cubo Kick 12 is the smallest cabinet at 45 x 45 x 50 cm (H x W x D). Initial measurements show it's capable of 110 - 250 Hz stand alone, a bit below 100 Hz when stacked in multiples. With the same frontal dimensions as Cubo 12, the output is high enough to use Cubo Kick in an 1:2 ratio (1.5:1 for live music). The cut sheet fits easily from a single sheet of 122 x 244 cm, 15 mm 11-ply Baltic birch is preferred. Designed around the 18Sound 12ND830. Other drivers that will work:

- Faital Pro 12FH520
- Faital Pro 12FH500

Development:

Over 10 prototypes were built to ensure a maximum output and clarity, in a minimum sized enclosure. Cubo Kick works with a wide variety of drivers, some of which are listed above, if unsure if your driver works, send me an e-mail at questionsaboutcubo at gmail dot com. Or visit the forum: Forum Topic Cubo Kick

It's advisable to use dampening material on all the walls in the rear chamber, except the baffle and without restricting air flow to the driver and reflex ports.

Plans Cubo Kick 15:

Size: 62x62x62cm    
Frequency: 80 Hz - 200 Hz    
Enclosure Type: Port Assisted Front Loaded Horn
 
 
Cubo Kick Render 2
 
Cubo KIck Render 3
 
 
Cubo KIck 15 Cut Sheet
 

Plans Cubo Kick 12:

Size: 45x45x50cm    
Frequency: 110 Hz - 250 Hz    
Enclosure Type: Port Assisted Front Loaded Horn
 
Cubo Kick 12 Render

Plans Cubo Kick 18:

Size: 62x62x65cm    
Frequency: 75 Hz - 190 Hz    
Enclosure Type: Port Assisted Front Loaded Horn
 
Cubo Kick 18 has been designed on request and is basically a Cubo Kick 15 redesigned to suit an 18" driver, giving it the exact same outer dimensions as Cubo 18. The increased rear chamber gives it a slightly lower tuning and the slightly longer horn makes it perhaps "the most 120 Hz" design out there.
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Discuss this article

Log in to comment

Posts in discussion: Cubo Kick
wigsgiw replied the topic:
#25094
4 months 2 weeks ago
Great thanks - yeah I'll definitely be going for the Kappa Pro 12A, not the non-pro.
icyCell replied the topic:
#25091
5 months 3 days ago
Lucky!

Was on my way to grab a 2nd hand pair of them when I caught your message.

Will be on the lookout for anything that fits criteria.

Thanks

- Cell
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25089
5 months 4 days ago
P.S. There is a solid difference between the Kappa 12 and Kappa 12 Pro (wigs).
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25088
5 months 4 days ago
The Xmax is 2.4 mm, that's really low. The Kappa 12 is already low with 3.2 mm.
icyCell replied the topic:
#25086
5 months 1 week ago
Hi Cubo,

Following on from wigs' message;
Would the Eminence Delta 12 work in lieu of the Kappa 12?

Delta 12A link

Thanks
- Cell
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25085
5 months 3 weeks ago
The Eminence Kappa Pro 12A does share the name with the Kappa Pro 15 but has worked out a little bit harder in the gym ever since. It should be able to get down to 100 Hz in singles but is pretty much guaranteed to do so in pairs, or (very close to a solid wall (2,0 pi radiation). I would first try it as is, playing with filter steepness and such, with closing of a port as a last resort.

16 mm ply is theoretically at least 2 times stiffer than 12 mm ply, if you're unsure what to use, make the heavier cabinet! That being said 12 mm will work.
wigsgiw replied the topic:
#25082
5 months 3 weeks ago
Hi Cubo,

Thanks for all your work. I'm trying to fill in a gap in my system, my sub is 100Hz at -3db and 110Hz at -10db. I want to feel the kick, and my tops don't cut it. Due to space constraints, I'm looking to build a Cubo Kick 12.

1. The Eminence Kappa Pro 15 is recommended for the Kick 15, but is the Eminence Kappa Pro 12A suitable for the Kick 12? Parameters below, link at eminence.com/products/kappa_pro_12a - limited range of drivers available in New Zealand.

Thiele & Small Parameters
Resonant Frequency (fs) 37 Hz
DC Resistance (Re) 5.46 Ω
Coil Inductance (Le) 1.22m H
Mechanical Q (Qms) 6.93
Electromagnetic Q (Qes) 0.25
Total Q (Qts) 0.24
Compliance Equivalent Volume (Vas) 121 liters / 4.27 cu.ft.
Peak Diaphragm Displacement Volume (Vd) 249 cc
Mechanical Compliance of Suspension (Cms)0.32 mm
NBL Product (BL) 17.3T-M
Diaphragm Mass Inc. Airload (MMs) 59 grams
Efficiency Bandwidth Product (EBP) 148
Maximum Linear Excursion (Xmax) 4.8 mm
Surface Area of Cone (Sd) 519.5 cm2
Maximum Mechanical Limit (Xlim) 14.8 mm

2. Realise that the Kick 12 is designed for 110Hz - 250Hz, but can it be tweaked to punch a bit lower, at 100Hz? Ideally I'd fill all the gap from 100Hz to 220Hz or so. Is blocking a port viable for the 12, as suggested in some other replies?

3. 15mm birch ply is hard to come by here in NZ, 16mm is standard or 12mm (which is far more cost effective). Aside from tweaking measurements to suit, would using 12mm ply instead of the 16mm affect sound characteristics and output?

Thank you, I appreciate your input and knowledge!

 
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25080
5 months 4 weeks ago
Oui,

Not the beafiest driver though, you might wanna add plenty of dampening material in the rear chamber.
Le princh replied the topic:
#25079
6 months 4 days ago
Bonjour,j ai une paire de monacor spa115pa ,je pensais faire 2 cubos avec,est ce compatible ?
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25066
1 year 6 months ago
If you need just one dimension altered, the width is by far the easiest (just reduce it). All coupling options you mentioned will give small deviations, 0.75 dB less here, +1.1 dB there, etc. It's nothing to loose sleep over, just experiment till you find something that is to your liking ;)
terrellhicks85 replied the topic:
#25065
1 year 6 months ago
if i need to resize these with either width or height to 22 7/8", how do they best couple? port to port? horn to horn? or vertical? or does it matter? ill be using some black widow kadt 1s that i already have and theyll be crossed from 100 to 2-300 between my subs and tops. thank you. 
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25062
1 year 8 months ago
The Celestion 15-FTR4080F is a good choice for 45 cm width.The lower limit of Cubo Kick at 45 cm wide raises to 90 Hz, the upper limit is usually extended up to 220 Hz. So a little bit less low end and a bit more top end in return.

If you cross the fbt at 100 Hz, that means you also cross the kick at 100 Hz. For the best result experiment with the crossover frequnecy till it sounds right, typically between 80 - 100 Hz. The blow to the chest is indeed centered around 120 Hz.

Celestion doesn't have a picture with dimensions for the 15-FTR, so it's difficult to predict but usually the magnet doesn't touch the rear panel. If it does let me know by then as the problem is easily solved.
.giuseppe . replied the topic:
#25061
1 year 8 months ago
as a woofer I had read that .....celestion FTR4080F 8 OHMit is OK
 (Do you recommend a woofer, which fits into the speaker without creating problems of modifying the enclosure, which does not hit its magnet on the frame when closed, perhaps without spending a lot of money) I read that I should feel the blow to the chest from 120 Hz in then, right? so if fbt I put it at 100hz at how many hz should I put the football cube? What are the advantages at 45cm, and what disadvantages do I have at 45cm?can I add handles?, what if I want to add a built-in amplifier?
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25060
1 year 8 months ago

is the the box Speaker 15LB100-8W from Thomann useable for this enclosure?

The 15LB100 is a good all round driver, it's geared a bit more towards bass than kick but they'll work in both Cubo 15 and Cubo Kick 15. In the latter for 80 - 200 Hz.

I would like to make a 15 cm football cube, I wanted to ask if it is possible to do the width of the cube is 45 cm.

Hi Giuseppe,

Yes, you can make Cubo Kick 45 cm wide, leave the height, depth and everything else the same. I would cross it around 100 Hz to the fbt 115SA. Do you know what loudspeaker you want to use in Cubo Kick?

Best regards Cubo
 
.giuseppe . replied the topic:
#25058
1 year 8 months ago
  hi cube, thank you very much for the excellent work you do, I am Italian and while searching in the various forums I found your projects and read many of your topics, I would like to make a 15 cm football cube, I wanted to ask if it is possible to do the width of the cube is 45 cm. (if I make it 45 cm wide do I have to change anything else? height, depth? ) thanks for everything, please, I'm ignorant on the subject so explain to me well I USE so well I USE so many technical terms, I have to combine it with a ''M SO CONFUSED
DevFelix replied the topic:
#25057
1 year 8 months ago
Hello Mr. Cubo,
is the the box Speaker 15LB100-8W from Thomann useable for this enclosure?

Greetings
Damianvick replied the topic:
#25044
2 years 1 week ago
You're a legend Cubo, thanks for your time and expertise!

After seeing your reply, I bought and fitted up the 18sound drivers this morning as I managed to pick them up for $500aud (vs $700+ to have the 2226's re-coned)... and with a party in 2 weeks I was keen to get them online.

They don't disappoint!
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25043
2 years 1 week ago
The benefit of refurbishing the 2226's is that you know what they sound like, the 15LW1200 is different as it's more of a horn oriented driver. It might drop a dB below 100 Hz but loads the horn better. As it's a high BL horn driver it can sound a bit more aggressive but as Cubo Kick is a bit more horn than reflex it's a good choice.

Great picture, goes in the yearbook!
Damianvick replied the topic:
#25042
2 years 2 weeks ago
Hello Mr. Cubo, 

Firstly, I want to thank you for your work and your commitment to helping all of us build our own rigs!

I built a couple of cubo kicks a year or two ago for obvious reasons (more kick!)... and they look so good, I modelled the rest of the rig's grills to match. 

I live in Australia where the choice of drivers is limited and expensive, but ended up acquiring a pair of second hand JBL 2226's. While they have some effect, they're clearly worn out and are not doing the cabinet justice.

I am faced with the choice of re-coning them, or replacing them. To that end, I have found someone local selling a pair of 18sound 15w1200's in good condition (specs are attached). 

Would these be suitable for cubo kicks, or am i better off having the 2226's refurbished?

Thanks in advance.
15w1200_2023-05-01.png
whitelines_2023-05-01.jpg
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25026
2 years 5 months ago
Thanks man, appreciate it.
lechris replied the topic:
#25023
2 years 5 months ago
In 2020 I've built two Cubo Kick 15 based on 18Sound 15ND930 for a venue in Leipzig.

Now that we have events again I can say that I am very happy with these speakers and I would say the build was a success.

During this build, I recreated the drawing by Cubo in Librecad to figure out some dimensions I could not discern from the drawing and to decide on details like where to put terminal plates and mounting holes for the speaker or the rear wall.

Maybe this can also be helpful for some other people who are building Cubo Kick 15, so I decided to share these drawings.

The proposed locations dimensions should provide clearance for Adam Hall 87160 Terminal plates and 18 Sound 15ND930. For other drivers/terminal plates, your mileage may vary.
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25021
2 years 6 months ago
The Celestion FTR15-4080FD is an allround driver, whether it's bass, mid or kick, it should feel right at home.
jsoto replied the topic:
#25018
2 years 6 months ago
Hi Cubo! Wonderful design! How would the Celestion FTR15-4080FD work in the Cubo Kick?

Resonant frequency     fS     35.4 Hz
Electrical Q     QES     0.30     
Mechanical Q     QMS     3.91     
Total Q factor     QTS     0.28     
Suspension equivalent air volume     VAS     164.3 litres
DC resistance     RE     5.6 Ω
Voice coil inductance     LE     1.38 mH
Force factor     B·l     23.05 T·m
Suspension mechanical resistance     RMS     7.24 N·s/m
Suspension mechanical compliance     CMS     160 µm/N
Moving mass     MMD     112.24 g
Moving mass (including airload)     MMS     127.19 g
Surface of the diaphragm     SD     850.9 cm²
Effective diaphragm diameter     Ø     33 cm
Maximum linear excursion     Xmax     ± 6 mm
Displacement volume at Xmax     VD     510.5 cm³
Efficiency     η₀     2.37 %
Efficiency bandwidth product     EBP     118    
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25002
2 years 11 months ago
Those are oki for sure,

The RCF MB15N351 has been optimized for mid-kick, the only draw back might be the light-ish cone, I would put a lot of dampening material on the walls of the rear chamber (just in case).

Cubo
modalen replied the topic:
#24999
2 years 11 months ago
I have a few RCF MB15N351.
Would they be oki for Cubo kick?
Resonant frequency fS 42 Hz
Electrical Q QES 0.24
Mechanical Q QMS 4.00
Total Q factor QTS 0.22
Suspension equivalent air volume VAS 191 litres
DC resistance RE 5.6 Ω
Minimum impedance Zmin 6.0 Ω
Voice coil inductance LE 1.65 mH
Force factor B·l 22.5 T·m
Suspension mechanical resistance RMS 5.3 N·s/m
Suspension mechanical compliance CMS 166 µm/N
Moving mass MMD 61.4 g
Moving mass (including airload) MMS 80 g
Surface of the diaphragm SD 900 cm²
Effective diaphragm diameter Ø 33 cm
Maximum linear excursion Xmax ± 6 mm
Excursion limit Xlim ± 19.5 mm
Displacement volume at Xmax VD 540 cm³
Efficiency η₀ 5.68 %
Efficiency bandwidth product EBP 175
Read More...

MS-46

Frequency: 32 to 110Hz

Enclosure Type: Scoop

Size: 600x900x720mm

Recommended Drivers: PD1850, v18-1000, LF18G401 Spec Sheet or low Qts drivers

Plan:  MS-46

 

Designer: This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

 

 

 

Discuss this article

Log in to comment

Posts in discussion: New scoop ms-46 by marc
javcmobile replied the topic:
#22834
9 years 10 months ago
What a great Box design, hope someday i will built this one.
Robbrown replied the topic:
#22814
9 years 11 months ago
are the gray areas wooden planks seen from the side? places in the middle of the cab? I'm new here ;-)
oxigenoman replied the topic:
#20712
11 years 7 months ago
Nice boxes !! I Have six of them! sounds great!
levyte357 replied the topic:
#18981
12 years 7 months ago
Looks very similiar to Rhino MK2, but with smaller chamber, simple rear baffle assembly.
bitzo replied the topic:
#18545
12 years 11 months ago
On hornresp I can't describe a differnce in the model. On akabak I can.
t.geessounds replied the topic:
#18541
12 years 11 months ago

vakarm wrote: descends so low as some scoop, but higher spl!
no board of reference in the corners because more is gained by level and serious response.

simulation with rcf 18G401

[img

so how the sim look with corners?
giveortake replied the topic:
#18536
12 years 11 months ago
Added: here
giveortake replied the topic:
#18509
12 years 11 months ago

joeysub wrote: saw this the other day, love his designs! :)

marc is a genius!


I agree, I will add it to the "Plans" section on Monday with some of latest designs.
joeysub replied the topic:
#18489
12 years 11 months ago
saw this the other day, love his designs! :)

marc is a genius!
vakarm replied the topic:
#18471
12 years 11 months ago
What a scoop that the best can not read things by keeping a low thunder spl level correct?

Scoop the favorite in England ?
bee replied the topic:
#18469
12 years 11 months ago
yes that is correct, from the looks of the plan this will be a more musical box high spl, but wont play thunderous low stuff.......
vakarm replied the topic:
#18468
12 years 11 months ago
descends so low as some scoop, but higher spl!
no board of reference in the corners because more is gained by level and serious response.

simulation with rcf 18G401

[img
bee replied the topic:
#18466
12 years 11 months ago
looks ok to me....
Read More...

Punisher Horn MKII

Frequency: 50 to 200Hz

Enclosure Type: Horn

Size: 700x500x810mm

Recommended Driver: pw332(12.00sw)

Plan:    Punisher-MK2

 

 

alt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

alt

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

alt

Settings: 2x Punisher/1x X-tro

Processor settings All filters 24db/oct Linkwitz/Riley s

Sub  hp: 40,5 hz (For a single cabinet a side 45Hz can be used) lp: 91,0 hz

low  hp: 99,2 hz  lp: 297 hz

mid  hp: 315 hz  lp: 2,38 khz

high  hp: 2,45 khz

Delay

sub  0

low  5,99 ft  1,82 mtr  5,31 msec

mid  6,81 ft  2,07 mtr  6,04 msec

high  7,21 ft  2,19 mtr  6,40 msec

EQ:

sub1 40-50Hz (depending on number of cabinets) gain: personal taste Q = 3-4

low  105 hz  -1,0 db  Q = 4,410

mid  2,25 khz  + 4,0 db  Q = 1,215

high  14,3 khz  +1,0 db  Q = 1,789

Website: http://www.speakerstore.nl/index.php?l=en&pg=11&c=21

Designers: Walt and  Frederik from www.speakerstore.nl

Discuss this article

Log in to comment

Posts in discussion: Punisher HORN II
inting replied the topic:
#22852
9 years 10 months ago
i hope..i build this one..
Lime replied the topic:
#22684
10 years 1 month ago
i'm not authorized for download..
is there anything to do?
giveortake replied the topic:
#22665
10 years 1 month ago
I have now edited the first post. It redirects to the correct page:
freespeakerplans.com/plans/14-plans/basscab/45-punisher-mk2

Let me know if you encounter any issue.

:)
arneblommaert replied the topic:
#22664
10 years 1 month ago
Plan is not available for download..
N.Dougal21 replied the topic:
#21585
11 years 1 month ago
can anyone tell me how many sheets per cab these take to build?
MAutopsy replied the topic:
#7999
15 years 2 months ago
Thanks bitzo- I gave myself a crash course in HornResp last night. Good stuff i have a much better understanding of it now.
bitzo replied the topic:
#7990
15 years 2 months ago
cms rms mmd can be calculated by HR, double click on each field, HR ask mms vas and fs to get this value.

However this sim is not so accurate. Divide the horn in 5 section.

cheers, bitzo
MAutopsy replied the topic:
#7976
15 years 2 months ago
Need some help, trying to figure out HR (V 26.20) and i am getting this error.
Got the Cab inputs from a speakerplans forum bitzo pointed me to and my driver specs are as follows:
Radian 2312
Resonant Frequency (Fs) 56 Hz
Impedance (Re) 5.3 ohms
Total Q (Qts) .214
Mechanical Q (Qms) 1.94
Electrical Factor(Qes) .241
Comp. Equivelant Vol. (Vas) 46.64 Liters / 1.65 cu. ft.
Voice Coil Overhang (Xmax) 3.66
BL Factor 23.1 T-M
Reference Efficiency (%) 3.3%
Surface Area of Cone (Sd)m2 .053 m2- 530 cm^2

I know that this probably wont come out right, as this isnt the right driver. I just would like to know what the error is and how i get the value.
giveortake replied the topic:
#7534
15 years 3 months ago
Fixing the links now...

[attachment=1:22mv232n]<!-- ia1 -->060_P-II.zip<!-- ia1 -->[/attachment:22mv232n]
[attachment=0:22mv232n]<!-- ia0 -->060_Plans.zip<!-- ia0 -->[/attachment:22mv232n]
bee replied the topic:
#7533
15 years 3 months ago
hope these help....

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img

[img
replied the topic:
#7531
15 years 3 months ago
im lookin for plan to build the punisher......the cad files arent ther nemore.....it will b much appreciated if sum1 send me a link to the plans

thankz kevin
Read More...

Cubo 15

Size: 62x62x62cm

Frequency: From 40 Hz up to 110 Hz

Enclosure Type: Hybrid

Recommended Driver: Kappalite-3015lf, Kappapro-15lf-2, kappa-15lf or  drivers with EBP of 100 or higher; Fs (27-50 Hz), Qts (0.21 - 0.41), Vas (150 - 300 L) / (7.4 - 11.1 ft^3). Where EBP = Fs / Qts (strictly speaking it's Fs / Qes)


Cubo 15: Cubo is a multi purpose, stand alone bass bin that will equal or out run a single 18" BR*, of similar size, from ~ 40 Hz and up in terms of sensitivity. Utilising a non-expensive driver such as the Eminence 3015LF, Kappa 15LF and Kappa 15LF Pro** and a cut list from a single 18 mm*** sheet (244 x 122 cm) / (8' x 4') with a single angled cut, Cubo 15" realizes a cost effective, small and light weight enclosure following the KISS-principle.

Development: In 2007 the first prototype was build and tested. Cubo 15" is the 4th prototype in a line of hybrids aiming at the achievements as stated above.  The measurement below shows the gain over the stated bass reflex (see * for details). Cubo 15 plans are also available in an Imperial version, plan available on request.

Versions: As a rule of thumb:

Qts x Vas > 120, Cubo Standard
Qts x Vas = 100 - 120, Cubo Extended or Standard
Qts x Vas < 100, Cubo Extended
Qts x Vas < 50; Cubo 15 Extra Extended

Magnet orientation:

The driver mounted with the magnet visible (the magnet in the horn) typicall gives the lowest bass response and slightly better cooling of the voice coil. Mount the driver with the magnet inside the chamber for most output around 60 - 80 Hz or the highest possible crossover frequency.

Footnotes:* 18Sound 18LW1400 in a 175 liter bass reflex tuned to 37 Hz. (6,6 ft^3) vs. Cubo 15 ; Eminence Kappa 15LF.          ** Apart from these drivers Cubo will work with a wide variëty of 15" drivers preferably with an EBP of 100 or higher; Fs (27-50 Hz), Qts (0.21 - 0.41), Vas (150 - 300 L) / (5.5 - 11.1 ft^3). Where EBP = Fs / Qts.  If you're uncertain if a driver is suited, PM or mail me at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.         *** If you want to use 15 mm material use 11-ply Baltic birch, nothing less. Plans available on request.

Designer: Cubo15 [view profile]alt

 

Cubo 15 Standard Plan:

Cutsheet (clearly visible after download):

Cubo 15 Extended Plan:

Cubo 15 Extra Extended Plan:

Only the 2 inner horn panels are different from Cubo 15 Extended, all else equal.

 

 

Discuss this article

Log in to comment

Posts in discussion: Cubo 15
nemsik replied the topic:
#25096
4 months 1 week ago
Something like this:
[img
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25095
4 months 1 week ago
I don't have HR installed, if you learn Hornresp then the numbers will make sense. I would go about it this way: i.imgur.com/2JY1eQ8.png and simulate it as a rear loaded horn (or TH), with a rear chamber of 55555 cm^3.

There are guides/ kickstarts on HR on the web, plus on diyaudio.com/forums I've seen Cubo HR inputs in the past.
Lofobia replied the topic:
#25093
4 months 2 weeks ago
Can you please show a pic with the settings in hornresp? As a hornresp newbie i din´t quite understand your post..
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25090
5 months 4 days ago
A quick start: 555, 1500 and 2000 cm2, plus 20 and 65 cm. The Extended part has 30 cm axial length IIRC.
Lofobia replied the topic:
#25087
5 months 6 days ago
Is there a cheat sheet for setup hornresp for simulate cubo 15 extended?
I need to simulate some drivers :)
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25055
1 year 9 months ago
It's not going to do great, do to its very low Vas (even compared to other 12" drivers). Its Vas is low, especially for use in a 15" enclosure, causing a large dip between 60 - 100 Hz. The PS100 will not have that problem (as its Vas is 3.5 times greater).
Tacatomon replied the topic:
#25054
1 year 9 months ago
Yes, I'm curious about the performance of the 12" in the Cubo 15 Extra Extended because it has a lot more excursion. Also, I have a 15PS100-8 to test out the box.
With a removable circular baffle for the 12" to fit the and seal the 15" box opening.
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25053
1 year 9 months ago
Do you want to use a 12" driver in Cubo 15, or do you mean the 15HP1030 instead?
Tacatomon replied the topic:
#25052
1 year 9 months ago
How would the FaitalPro 12HP1030 perform in the Cube 15 Extra Extended?

www.loudspeakerdatabase.com/Faital/12HP1030#4%CE%A9
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25036
2 years 2 months ago
That depends on the clearance in front of the drivers and the excursion they make. To make sure that the accordion surrounds of the two drivers can not touch each other you might want to use a spacer ring between the drivers. I.e. an 18 mm MDF ring between the drivers doesn't hurt the outcome but might not be needed.
Buje replied the topic:
#25033
2 years 3 months ago
Thank you, I have 4 Ev 15 dl 400, to test, the location, front to front, do you need any modification for this?
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25030
2 years 3 months ago
It is, however a single driver with double the power handling will work just as well.
Buje replied the topic:
#25029
2 years 3 months ago
Cubo 15 isobaric is posible? thanks
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25008
2 years 9 months ago
The high pass is good, I know that some Cuboteers cross Cubo 15 at 120 Hz or higher but I prefer 80 - 100 Hz myself, so I can't personally recommend it. The Turbosound tcx115b looks like a good choice, it won't be as loud as a Cubo 15 but it works better with the amplifier/ processing that you've got. So unless you're able to use additional EQ on the Cubo 15 (to suppress 100 - 150 Hz), I think the Turbosound tcx115 is a good choice. Best regards Cubo
savior replied the topic:
#25007
2 years 9 months ago
thanks cube, my problem is that I would use his original amplifier which has the cuts already set and not settable!
you say they won't do?
the amp delivers 550watt, the cut is from 38hz to 120hz.
however in the diagram I may see that the cut is at 40hz 12db.
I'm ignorant of technical data! i have manufacturing experience with cnc machines, but i have always built cabinets and heads for guitar amps designed by others.
do you think maybe a bandpass like the turbosound tcx115b would be better, which as a frequency range is very similar to my sw540 sub? 

Attachment not found

Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25006
2 years 9 months ago
Those are actually pretty good drivers, I would use them in Cubo 15 Extended or Extra Extended up to about 80 - 100 Hz. The only thing lacking is the Xmax, I would use a high pass at 40 Hz and use about 500 W of amplifier power per driver.

Cubo
savior replied the topic:
#25005
2 years 10 months ago
hi cube, i'm savior from italy. i have a problem with 2 sub montarbo sw540. in practice they have the plastic cabinet and too small, so these subs sound the same way both front and back! I was thinking of building two new cabinets and came across the cube 15 project.
the features of my sw540 sub are:
MOSFET amplifier (class AB)
Max. Output power 550 watts continuous rms 850 max peak
Frequency Response 38Hz ÷ 120Hz ± 1dB
impedance 4ohms
Stereo electronic crossover 24dB / octave Crossover frequency 120hz

I think the woofer is from B&C but you don't know the model! however i found some specifications of this woofer in the manual.
Nominal diameter 15 "
Frequency range 37 ÷ 2000Hz
Sensitivity 99db
Rated impedance 4 ohms
Net weight 8 kg
FS 37hz
RE 3.04 Ohms
Qms 16.93
Qes 0.35
Qts 0.34
Vas 0.1m3
ηo 3.17%
B.l 16.62 T / m
SD 0.085m2
Xmax ± 5.25mm
 
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25003
2 years 11 months ago
Both the STX W.38.1200.8.MC and W.38.800.8.MC look good on paper, except one thing, the weight of the drivers doesn't correspond to such T/S-parameters: Normally you wouldn't use the physical weight of a driver to base it's performance on, but since all these drivers have ferrite magnets and from the looks of the photo's also have aluminium baskets, you would expect better overall performance with an increasing physical weight.

The 1508-8 SPS BWX for example, weighs 7.7 kg but it has a high-ish Qes (less magnet needed) and small Xmax (4.7 mm again less magnet needed), so those numbers add up.
The Kappa Pro 15LF, weighs 10 kg, has a medium Qes and Xmax, and a 3" voice coil instead of a 4" voice coil like the Black Widow has. Again those numbers add up.

The STX W.38.1200.8.MC, weighs 7.5 kg, (claims a large voice coil and Xmax, medium Qes) and the T/S-parameters suggest it would would be close in performance to the 15TBX100, however the 15TBX100 (also large voice coil and Xmax, medium Qes) weighs 12.3 kg.

So something is off, as I'm rather safe than sorry, I would exclude the STX drivers from the list.

1) Kappa Pro 15LF
2) Black Widow 1508-8 sps (or the Kappa 15LF, 9 kg but a steel chassis)

Cubo
nemsik replied the topic:
#25001
2 years 11 months ago
Hello Oskar,
I have used two "W.38.800.8.MC" from two different series and I think they are quite weak speakers, so I don't know if the "W-38-1200-8-MC" will be much better.
Currently, I have loaded 15TBX100 and the difference is big.
oskarociak replied the topic:
#25000
2 years 11 months ago
Hello Cubo.
Can you judge which of these speakers is best for the cubo 15?
a) Kappa pro 15 lf2
b) Black Widow 1508-8 sps
c) STX W.38.1200.8.MC
Thank you in advance for your answer
Zambrotta replied the topic:
#24992
2 years 11 months ago
but the one loaded with the 2226 is the meanest of them all thank you for the design brother
Zambrotta replied the topic:
#24991
2 years 11 months ago
ok thank you for your feedback Cubo I already have 3 x Cubo 15 extended two of them loaded with p.audio bm-15w and one with the p.audio p150/2226h and their spl is amazing....
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24989
3 years 37 minutes ago
Hi Zambrotta,

That's a good driver for Cubo 15 Extended, only drawback is the short Xmax, therefor a 40 Hz high pass is advised.
Zambrotta replied the topic:
#24985
3 years 1 day ago
Hello Cubo I would like to try out the Cubo sub 15 but I only have a p.audio p150/2226 15inch driver that one with a blue basket at my disposal what are the chances of it doing well in that cabinet
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24980
3 years 1 month ago
Hi,

It's 30 Hz vs 40 Hz. I''d go for Qts below ~0.4 and Xmax over 7 mm, if you elaborate your question, you'll get a more sophisticated answer ;)
Read More...

Cubo Sub

alt

Cubo Sub / Cubo 21

The largest cabinet from the Cubo series stands upon the edge of portabilty; To big to be compact, to compact to be big.

Like it's predecessors Cubo 12, Cubo 15 and Cubo 18 it's a stand-alone bass bin. It will equal or out run an 18" reflex cabinet from 30 Hz and up in terms of sensitivty*. Like all Cubo-designs it excels on the KISS-principle, with a single angled cut and a cut list from 1 and a 1/2 sheets of 244 x 122 cm / 8' x 4'.

Development

Based on Cubo 15 and Cubo 18, Cubo Sub is the 3rd prototype in a series of cabinets aiming at good reproduction down to 30 Hz. Mount the driver with the magnet in the horn for best low frequency reproduction from 30 Hz up to 100 Hz. With the magnet in the chamber for maximum output from 35 Hz up to 110 Hz.

Versions

Cubo Sub is optimized for single 15"/ 18" drivers**, and single 21" drivers, nicknamed Cubo 21. 

All 21" drivers will fit in the standard Cubo Sub but in that case care must be taken when pre-drilling the bolt pattern. Plans for Cubo 21 are available through e-mail (questionsaboutcubo at gmail dot com).

*        Measurement against BR18a tuned to 37 Hz

**      Due to reproducing sub frequencies 18" drivers with an Xmax of 7 mm or more are favoured. On average a 15" needs 1.5 times the excursion capabilities to produce the same output as an 18" driver or 2 times that of a 21" driver.

Acknowledgements

The designer likes to thank Xoc1 for his aid in the development process.

 

 

alt

 

alt

 

alt

 alt

 Download highest quality: Picture below / right click / save as.

alt

alt

  Download highest quality: Picture below / right click / save as.

alt

 

Preliminary measurements can be found here: http://www.freespeakerplans.com/index.php?option=com_jfusion&Itemid=64&jfile=viewtopic.php&p=11555#p11555

Discuss this article

Log in to comment

Posts in discussion: Cubo Sub
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25064
1 year 7 months ago
HI,

You can adjust the width to 660 mm, without any issues. I would set the high pass at 20 - 30 Hz (experiment a bit with frequency and slope untill it sounds just right), if you're going for maximum power/ output 30 Hz is better.
shem1 replied the topic:
#25063
1 year 7 months ago
HI Mr cubo could i make the cubo sub 660mm wide instead of 620?
Also what hpf would i need on the cubo sub running a pd186 mk1 in it?>
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25047
1 year 11 months ago
There actually is, send me an e-mail at questionsaboutcubo at gmail dot com
Zambrotta replied the topic:
#25045
1 year 11 months ago
Hello cubo is there a plan for a dual cubo sub 18
Tetris replied the topic:
#25041
2 years 3 weeks ago
Over 6 years since I asked, I've FINALLY got round to starting my RCF LF18X401 powered Cubo Subs! Unfortunately due to the astronomical cost of birch ply now, I've gone for MDF, but one is nearly finished and am excited to see the results! Have incorporated handles into the bottom bracing which I hope won't affect things too much, but after years of negotiating stairs, I felt this was a necessary compromise! Will post updates when ready (don't hole your breath)  

Attachment not found

Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25016
2 years 7 months ago
A typical Cubo Sub driver has a Fs between 25 - 40 Hz, a Qts between 0.2 - 0.4 (lower is favourable) and a Vas between 150 - 300 Liter. Xmax 7 mm or more (more is better), a 4" voice coil (or larger) and Xmech preferably 20 mm or more (one way). A typical ferrite 18" will at least weigh in at 12 kilo (25 lbs).
Zambrotta replied the topic:
#25015
2 years 8 months ago
ok thanks so can you give me a guide on what to look at in the thiele parameters of a 18 inch driver that would do well in the cubo sub. Am sorry am still a novice in the diy speaker building

Zambrotta
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#25013
2 years 8 months ago
To be honest it's not the greatest loudspeaker, it might be meant for car audio originally (low Vas, high Qes) but it simulates surprisingly well in Cubo Sub. Without any alterations, going both low and loud with a rising response, wouldn't cross it too high though (preferably a steep 80 Hz-ish crossover).

Cubo
Zambrotta replied the topic:
#25012
2 years 8 months ago
Hello Cubo how are you the driver i can access for my cubo sub build has got the following parameters

Fs = 55Hz
Qms= 3.745
Vas=2.377 cu. ft
Cms=0.041mm/N
Mms=204.2g
Rms=18.85kg/s
Xmax=8mm
P-Diameter=370mm
Sd=1075sq.cm
P-Vd=0.86 liters
Qes=0.75
Re=5 ohms
Le=0.61mH
Z=5ohms
BL=21.69Tm
Pe=1000watts
Qts=0.625
no=1.439%
1-w Spl =93.73db
2.83-V SPL=95.77db


I would like to find out from you if its a good driver for the cubo sub and if there are any adjustments to be made on the cubo sub to get maximum output from it

Best regards

Zambrotta
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24890
3 years 9 months ago
That does defeat part of the hybrid purpose, as the "tap" near the horn mouth does give it an ever so slight increase in output (near 60 Hz). It follows the concept of the 'tapped horn' in that regard instead of a 'rear loaded horn' a.k.a 'scoop' (driver placed on the front/ not in the horn mouth). The SBH is a 'front loaded horn' with a low frequency output nearer Cubo Sub IIRC.

Cubo 18 and Cubo Sub are two different designs.

 
blake8188 replied the topic:
#24887
3 years 9 months ago
Would it be possible to design some kind of hybrid between the Cubo 18" and the SBH in the sense that the driver in the Cubo would be in its own seperate space instead of the mouth of the horn/end of the throat? Or does that just defeat the purpose of it being a hybrid? I'm quite new to this so excuse the poor terminology please :)
Andrew4566 replied the topic:
#24835
4 years 3 weeks ago
Is the three layer buildup on the opposite side of the horn from the Driver for strength or needed for the horn tapper?

-Andy
Andrew4566 replied the topic:
#24833
4 years 3 weeks ago
Is the three layer buildup on the opposite side of the horn from the Driver for strength or needed for the horn tapper?

-Andy
Andrew4566 replied the topic:
#24827
4 years 3 weeks ago
Thanks Cubo!!
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24826
4 years 3 weeks ago
The main benefit of a 21" driver over an 18" driver (in Cubo Sub) is either when you EQ it down low or when you have a lot of power available. I've send you the plans for Cubo 21 from questionsaboutcubo.

Cubo
Andrew4566 replied the topic:
#24825
4 years 4 weeks ago
18sound 21lw1400...I accidentally bought these.

Could you please assess how well this driver would work in the Cubo Sub?

-Andy
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24763
4 years 4 months ago
I would rate them exactly in that order:

1. RCF LF18X401
2. Eighteensound 18LW1400
3. Fane Colossus Prime 18XS

Best regards Cubo
shashnatiq replied the topic:
#24762
4 years 4 months ago
Hi Cubo.
Which of these drivers wold be best suited for the Cubo Sub?
RCF LF18X401
Eighteensound 18LW1400
Fane Colossus Prime 18XS
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24715
4 years 6 months ago

but it never sounded that great due to the heavy cone I think

It would be really nice if you new the T/S-parameters of the PD.

Now it's difficult to say whether you didn't like the driver, the cabinet or the incorporation into the rest of your system slash processing. If you know the T/S-parameters it's easy to compare them to the 21PW1400Fe and say if it's the same or completely different and if it attributed to your experience of the Cubo 21. To answer your question whether this is going to improve things for you without the T/S-parameters, we need to figure out what you didn't like about it exactly. What did (or didn't)  you do to it, processing, amplifier power, what tops did you use (any delay on those), magnet inside the chamber, magnet inside the horn, etc. To me the 18LW1400 in Cubo Sub with the magnet inside the horn or inside the chamber sounded like two different cabinets, one for 'rumble' and the other one rather tight and loud.

It would also help if you have heard the PD's in another enclosure, anything that tells us if it's the driver, Cubo or system settings, or a combination of those.

Typically a 21" driver doesn't perform that much better than an 18" driver, in the same sized enclosure, it just has more potential. You need either a lot of power or quite a bit of EQ to get that potential (air displacement) to fruition. Someone in the Netherlands is building a custom version of it and probably going for the RCF LF21N551 or Lavoce SAN215.30, I assume with a small nuclear reactor to power the amplifiers because they can handle it and need that kind of power to really shine (beyond the scope of an 18" driver).

Best regards Cubo
space141 replied the topic:
#24714
4 years 6 months ago
Hello Cubo and fellow community members.

I made a 21" version of the Cubo Sub a few years back now which was fitted with an old-shool Precision Devices driver that was rated 750W rms (ET211S) but it never sounded that great due to the heavy cone I think.

Can anyone shed any light on the following driver and whether it would be suitable for the CUBO SUB - I cannot find any recommeded TS parameters for drivers on the page, neither can I find a post of anyone else making the 21" version to my knowledge.

Any insight would be greatly appreciated - the driver is the Beyma 21PW1400Fe with the following specs:

Thiele-Small Parameters

Resonant Frequency (fs) 30 Hz
Impedance (Re) 5.2 ohms
Coil Inductance (Le) 3.7 mH
Mechanical Q (Qms) 7.44
Electrical Factor (Qes) .36
Total Q (Qts) .34
Comp. Equivalent Vol. (Vas) 14.18 ft3 / 401.5 Liters
Voice Coil Overhang (Xmax) 10.0 mm
Surface Area of Cone (Sd)m2 0.1734m2
Reference Efficiency 2.83%
Displacement Volume (Vd) 1729 cm3

Many thanks in advance,

TLC.
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24650
4 years 9 months ago
I suppose you mean reducing the inner width to 30 cm, although I would make it as small as possible, so perhaps 28 cm inner width. Also, with a single driver that wouldn't work out all that great, I would fit two 10" drivers (one behind the other) on the baffle. It should just fit, with about 1 cm between the drivers. Only one 10" simply doesn't have the Sd to make it work but two have.
Now, although I'm a big fan of 12V PA systems that drop down low, it isn't the most energy efficient. If output is more important or how long the battery lasts, two Cubo 12 (with reduced inner width) will have more output between 50 - 80 Hz. This is where the most energy in bass is located, it won't sound as low but add a lot of thump.

Cubo
SubMeditation replied the topic:
#24648
4 years 9 months ago
Greetings Cubo,

do you think i could adjust the inner depth to about 30cm and put thi 10" driver in: www.lautsprechershop.de/pdf/mivoc/awm104.pdf ?
I've builded a tapped horn with this speaker and want to know if the extra wood & weight is really worth it, because i'm planing to build serveral of them for some 5ghz connected 12v bicycle systems.

Cheers
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24635
4 years 10 months ago
I don't have any of the data anymore, I suggest making a (2D-)model in Sketchup and derive the Hornresp input parameters from there, if you need any pointers let me know.
Cubo
Stefist replied the topic:
#24630
4 years 10 months ago
Hello

I would be curious to see the simulationwith a rcf 18X451, A b&c 18DS115 and a bms 18n862.

Can anyone do this ?

cheers
Cubo15 replied the topic:
#24601
4 years 11 months ago
I have no data.
Read More...
  1. MKH-230
  2. MTB-246
  3. MTH-46LC
  4. Apache H15

Page 1 of 3

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Sitemap - Disclaimer - This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.